Cassandra Ong FILE PHOTO
MANILA, Philippines — In what was a lightweight second through the grueling 13-hour listening to of the Home of Representatives’ quad-committee, Antipolo 2nd District Rep. Romeo Acop chided Katherine Cassandra Li Ong for supposedly having preferential remedy in direction of dashing lawmakers.
Acop, through the latter a part of the quad-committee listening to on Wednesday, expressed confusion as to why Ong refused to reply questions from Batangas 2nd District Rep. Gerville Luistro however responded instantly to 1-Rider party-list Rep. Ramon Rodrigo Gutierrez and Santa Rosa Metropolis Rep. Dan Fernandez.
“Now, Madam Cassie Ong, kanina no’ng si Honorable Luistro ang nagtatanong po sa inyo, eh para bang ayaw niyong sumagot, tinanong pa kita what was your reply, ang sagot mo sa akin ‘I refuse to testify’. Bakit noong si Legal professional, si Honorable Gutierrez at saka si Honorable Fernandez ang nagtanong, loosen up na loosen up kang sumagot,” Acop stated.
(Now, Madam Cassie Ong, some time in the past when it was Honorable Luistro who was asking you, you didn’t need to reply. I even requested you why, and also you stated ‘I refuse to testify’. Why is it that you simply had been relaxed when Honorable Gutierrez and Honorable Fernandez had been elevating questions?)
“Kaya tuloy ako hindi nagtanong kanina. Oo, dahil kanina refuse to testify ang ok’wan mo, ang sagot mo iha eh. Kaya tuloy hindi na ako nagtanong. Pero napansin ko no’ng ‘yong mga gwapong lalaki ang nagtatanong, eh sumagot po kayo at relaxed na relaxed na. Could I do know the rationale why?” he requested.
Article continues after this commercial
(That’s why I didn’t ask questions some time in the past. Since you answered by saying that you simply refuse to testify. However I noticed that when good-looking guys had been asking you, you answered instantly and also you appeared relaxed.)
Article continues after this commercial
In response, Ong stated she actually didn’t need to give solutions however the recommendation of her lawyer, Ferdinand Topacio, to answer the queries simply coincided with the 2 lawmakers talked about.
“Okay, can I clarify po ‘di ba? No’ng una, I actually need to refuse to reply po, after which kinausap po ako ng abugado ko na magsalita na sa committee na ito, that’s why nagsalita po ako, tumiming lang po talaga kay Madam Chair,” Ong stated.
(Okay, can I clarify? First, I actually need to refuse to reply, after which I talked to my lawyer who instructed me to reply to the committee, that’s why I simply talked, it simply timed with the questions of the Madam Chair.)
Previous to this change, Acop additionally requested Ong if she was capable of focus on points with Fernandez forward of the quad-committee listening to, saying that it appears the latter is aware of greater than the remainder of the panel’s members.
In response, Ong stated that he was capable of change messages and actually have a telephone name with Fernandez, for one occasion.
“Earlier than this listening to — as a result of we carried out a joint committee listening to of the video games and amusements and the general public order and security. You had been cited for contempt there, that’s the reason you’re right here as we speak. Since that listening to, had been you capable of discuss with Honorable Fernandez?” Acop requested.
“As a result of he is aware of lots that I don’t know. I’m an investigator, I hope you perceive that. No, as a result of whenever you went in, the best way you and Honorable Fernandez checked out one another had a unique which means. You had been glancing at him a number of occasions to the purpose that I assumed he’s your lawyer, not Legal professional Topacio eh. Did you textual content one another or discuss over the telephone? Sure or no?” he added.
“As soon as lang ‘yon pare isang beses lang,” Fernandez, who was heard speaking on the background, stated.
“As soon as solely […] Textual content and and telephone name, as soon as lang po,” Ong admitted.
Prior these discussions, the quad-committee cited Ong for contempt anew after she refused to reply questions from lawmakers, saying that she was invoking her proper towards self-incrimination.
Ultimately, Ong modified her solutions, replying with a extra direct “I refuse to testify,” prompting Manila sixth District Rep. Bienvenido Abante Jr. to make the movement.
READ: Home quad-panel cites Cassandra Ong for contempt anew
However Ong’s tone ultimately modified, as she began to reply questions throughout Gutierrez’ flip to interpellate. Gutierrez — who was one of many few lawmakers who received Vice President Sara Duterte to talk through the deliberations for the Workplace of the Vice President (OVP) proposed finances for 2025 — managed to get affirmation that Ong labored for each Whirlwind Company and Fortunate South 99.
Whirlwind Company, the place Ong holds a 58 % stake, is the corporate that leased land in Porac, Pampanga, to Fortunate South 99, which then set-up a Philippine offshore gaming operator (Pogo) hub.
There have been hunches from lawmakers that Whirlwind and Fortunate South 99 had been interconnected — a perception that was confirmed when Ong answered Gutierrez’ queries.
READ: After VP Duterte, Rep. Gutierrez additionally will get Cassandra Ong to talk
Like Ong, Vice President Duterte additionally shunned straight answering questions raised by lawmakers on Tuesday, solely saying that she both forgoes the chance to defend the finances in a question-and-answer format, or insisting that they’ve already coordinated with the Fee on Audit relating to the discover of disallowance on the confidential funds (CF).
Because of Duterte’s solutions, tensions flared with ACT Lecturers party-list Rep. France Castro likening the Vice President to a squid who releases ink when underneath strain.
The breakthrough got here throughout Gutierrez’s questioning, as Duterte claimed that there was a script being adopted since 2023, the place the CF situation could be used to assault her and the OVP.
Gutierrez requested why the OVP not spent its CF for the fourth quarter of 2023. Based on the Vice President, they not used the CF after Congress eliminated the key funds for the proposed 2024 finances, to indicate that they will survive with out it.